Blog Feeds
07-13 12:48 PM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
The battle for comprehensive immigration reform is going to be tough as Senate Republicans play politics with the critical immigration issue. The Senate passed its $44.3 billion fiscal 2010 Homeland Security appropriations measure 84-6 last week after three days of debate that differentiated the bill from its House companion on a handful of border security and immigration policies. Unfortunately Senate Republicans used the opportunity to add significant new provisions to the less controversial �extender provisions� including an extension to the Special Immigrant Nonminister Religious Worker Program and the Conrad Waiver Program for Physicians Serving in Underserved Areas. The Senate also included a provision promoted by AILA member Brent Renison to allow the foreign-born widows, children and parents of citizens who have died to retain their legal status to seek citizenship for two years after the death. Senate Appropriations Bill a Mixed Bag of Immigration Provisions (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=29510)
Senate Republicans added a provision to their chamber�s version of the bill (Schumer: Immigration bill to be ready by Labor Day (javascript:simplePopup()
Sen. Schumer the lead Democrat expects to have a bill ready by Labor Day that is more generous to highly skilled immigrant workers than those who are lower skilled and is tough on future waves of illegal immigration."
Even the Homeland Security Department spokesman Matthew Chandler said the Senate endorsement of Vitter's measure prevents real progress on immigration enforcement and is "a reflection of the old administration's strategy: all show, no substance."
In contrast, the Obama administration is trying to implement effective enforcement, he said. "We hope that the smarter strategy will prevail in the end, because the country deserves a system that works," Chandler said. http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE5690F420090710 Reuters: U.S. Senate approves $42.9 billion homeland security bill.
Lets hope only hope the Senate and House conferees remove the fence building and E-Verify proposals that are obstacles to achieving a much needed reform of our immigration laws.https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-4551757837994116508?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/comprehensive-immigration-reform-battle.html)
The battle for comprehensive immigration reform is going to be tough as Senate Republicans play politics with the critical immigration issue. The Senate passed its $44.3 billion fiscal 2010 Homeland Security appropriations measure 84-6 last week after three days of debate that differentiated the bill from its House companion on a handful of border security and immigration policies. Unfortunately Senate Republicans used the opportunity to add significant new provisions to the less controversial �extender provisions� including an extension to the Special Immigrant Nonminister Religious Worker Program and the Conrad Waiver Program for Physicians Serving in Underserved Areas. The Senate also included a provision promoted by AILA member Brent Renison to allow the foreign-born widows, children and parents of citizens who have died to retain their legal status to seek citizenship for two years after the death. Senate Appropriations Bill a Mixed Bag of Immigration Provisions (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=29510)
Senate Republicans added a provision to their chamber�s version of the bill (Schumer: Immigration bill to be ready by Labor Day (javascript:simplePopup()
Sen. Schumer the lead Democrat expects to have a bill ready by Labor Day that is more generous to highly skilled immigrant workers than those who are lower skilled and is tough on future waves of illegal immigration."
Even the Homeland Security Department spokesman Matthew Chandler said the Senate endorsement of Vitter's measure prevents real progress on immigration enforcement and is "a reflection of the old administration's strategy: all show, no substance."
In contrast, the Obama administration is trying to implement effective enforcement, he said. "We hope that the smarter strategy will prevail in the end, because the country deserves a system that works," Chandler said. http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE5690F420090710 Reuters: U.S. Senate approves $42.9 billion homeland security bill.
Lets hope only hope the Senate and House conferees remove the fence building and E-Verify proposals that are obstacles to achieving a much needed reform of our immigration laws.https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-4551757837994116508?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/comprehensive-immigration-reform-battle.html)
wallpaper underwear Kobe Bryant Shoes
buehler
12-13 06:06 PM
Did you ever used EAD? Just getting an EAD does not mean you were on EAD.
Also AP does not invilidate your H1. If you are working with the H1 sponsoring employer and never used EAD, then you need not worry.
ssdtm & laksmi,
Thanks for your replies. I am still working for my H1 job. But I did use my EAD for some time to do a part time job. I have not done any part time work since the EAD expired.
Can I still get my pay from my H1 job or should I wait for EAD approval?
Also AP does not invilidate your H1. If you are working with the H1 sponsoring employer and never used EAD, then you need not worry.
ssdtm & laksmi,
Thanks for your replies. I am still working for my H1 job. But I did use my EAD for some time to do a part time job. I have not done any part time work since the EAD expired.
Can I still get my pay from my H1 job or should I wait for EAD approval?
wandmaker
01-01 07:07 PM
H1B LUDs may be due to PIMS data collection, I heard most of the H1Bs approved after Jan 2004 had LUDs and the status did not change; and 140 could be a regular system touch.
2011 kobe bryant wife vanessa ring.
unknown123
10-28 09:51 PM
I agree with Mr. Bond
We need some basic administrative fixes and recapture of visas before we all burn out. I just hope whoever wins will give us some relief before any major over haul...
We need some basic administrative fixes and recapture of visas before we all burn out. I just hope whoever wins will give us some relief before any major over haul...
more...
EndlessWait
01-13 12:01 PM
???
vinzak
11-10 02:06 PM
Tareek pe Tareek, Tareek pe Tareek...GC dene wala nahi rehta...GC lene wala nahi rehta....sirf reh jaati hai TAREEEK!!! ;)
If you don't know what I'm talking about...
YouTube - DAMINI - Tareekh Pe Tareekh (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tHLAQVPZ48)
If you don't know what I'm talking about...
YouTube - DAMINI - Tareekh Pe Tareekh (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tHLAQVPZ48)
more...
pressman
January 5th, 2005, 05:22 AM
I have cropped a little and added toning and contrast. I think it adds a different slant to the image - though not necessarily better.
Pete
Pete
2010 Seiko Edition Kobe Bryant
ShadowViper
06-27 02:04 AM
Cool picture.
What type of phone do you have that has that kind of image quality?
What type of phone do you have that has that kind of image quality?
more...
minimalist
06-25 10:25 PM
Each case is different. Please wait for your lawyer to receive it.
Hi,
I just got an update on my and my wife I-485; i dont know what it is but they have requested for more information.
Can any one clarrify that who will get the RFE? will it be me or my lawyer?
If possible can any tell what it would be?
Thanks in advance !!!
Hi,
I just got an update on my and my wife I-485; i dont know what it is but they have requested for more information.
Can any one clarrify that who will get the RFE? will it be me or my lawyer?
If possible can any tell what it would be?
Thanks in advance !!!
hair kobe bryant wife vanessa ring
gccovet
08-04 08:56 AM
cool, congrats.!!
USCIS works in mysterious ways!!!
enjoy
GCCovet.
USCIS works in mysterious ways!!!
enjoy
GCCovet.
more...
fromnaija
09-01 04:52 PM
1) can my spouses h1b get 7th year extension based on this?
no
2) if not, can my spouse move to h4?
yes
no
2) if not, can my spouse move to h4?
yes
hot hairstyles Kobe Bryant Los
seemashah
02-21 04:26 PM
Hi:
I was working for Company A from 2000 to 2004. Company A applied for my GC in 2002. However, the company was not doing well until I left it. It was not paying me the salary which came out in PW. Company A continued with my GC processing and I filed for I140 and 485 last year in June. Now received the following RFE for I140:
Please submit documentary evidence that you, the petitioning employer, have the financial
ability to pay the wage/salary you offered the beneficiary. This evidence must show that you
have this financial capability on the date you fied the ETA with the Department of Labor and
cover up until the visa is issued. The petitioner may submit evidence that their net income is
equal to or greater than the proffered wage, evidence that the petitioner's net current assets
are equal to or greater than the proffered wage, or evidence that the petitioner not only is
employing the beneficiary but also has paid or is currently paying the proffered wage. The
service wil also consider copies of audited annual reports of the employer, or copies of
audited financial statements of the employer. Evidence is needed for 2002-2003.
Does anyone have some idea how to get the audited financial statements or audited annual reports?. I know that the company never had any audited reports. I had submitted the bank statements of the company and the tax returns with my I140. However, it seems that they want the audited reports. The company was not doing well in 2002/2003. However, it is doing well now. So any input will be highly appreciated.
I was working for Company A from 2000 to 2004. Company A applied for my GC in 2002. However, the company was not doing well until I left it. It was not paying me the salary which came out in PW. Company A continued with my GC processing and I filed for I140 and 485 last year in June. Now received the following RFE for I140:
Please submit documentary evidence that you, the petitioning employer, have the financial
ability to pay the wage/salary you offered the beneficiary. This evidence must show that you
have this financial capability on the date you fied the ETA with the Department of Labor and
cover up until the visa is issued. The petitioner may submit evidence that their net income is
equal to or greater than the proffered wage, evidence that the petitioner's net current assets
are equal to or greater than the proffered wage, or evidence that the petitioner not only is
employing the beneficiary but also has paid or is currently paying the proffered wage. The
service wil also consider copies of audited annual reports of the employer, or copies of
audited financial statements of the employer. Evidence is needed for 2002-2003.
Does anyone have some idea how to get the audited financial statements or audited annual reports?. I know that the company never had any audited reports. I had submitted the bank statements of the company and the tax returns with my I140. However, it seems that they want the audited reports. The company was not doing well in 2002/2003. However, it is doing well now. So any input will be highly appreciated.
more...
house wallpaper kobe bryant
sushant_s
08-25 09:19 PM
Hi All,
I am here in US on a H1B and my wife is on a H4. She recently got admission to a graduate school and has to start next week. I am worried that if I get her COS for the next semester (this is a 1 year program), then woud she be eligible to get her OPT at the end of the program? She would have been on a F1 for less than a year, but would have completed the Master's program.
I tried to get more information, but what I saw was that the OPT eligiblility requirement is atleast 1 full academic year on F1. Is this correct?
Help is greatly appreciated.
I am here in US on a H1B and my wife is on a H4. She recently got admission to a graduate school and has to start next week. I am worried that if I get her COS for the next semester (this is a 1 year program), then woud she be eligible to get her OPT at the end of the program? She would have been on a F1 for less than a year, but would have completed the Master's program.
I tried to get more information, but what I saw was that the OPT eligiblility requirement is atleast 1 full academic year on F1. Is this correct?
Help is greatly appreciated.
tattoo kobe bryant basketball jersey.
howzatt
12-12 12:53 PM
It looks like we just missed a great opportunity to post a legal immigration question on change.gov. The goods news is that they will roll this out next week. So if you want to submit a question, be ready!...I will be sure to bump this thread..
Go here and type "legal immigration" in the search questions field.
http://change.gov/page/content/20081211_openforquestions
I saw a few questions already posted about legal immigration reform. We should all register and vote for these questions(whenever they roll this out again next week). It takes less than a minute to register. All they ask for is your name, zip code and email address.
Mods, Please discard this if this idea has already been put forward.
Go here and type "legal immigration" in the search questions field.
http://change.gov/page/content/20081211_openforquestions
I saw a few questions already posted about legal immigration reform. We should all register and vote for these questions(whenever they roll this out again next week). It takes less than a minute to register. All they ask for is your name, zip code and email address.
Mods, Please discard this if this idea has already been put forward.
more...
pictures Kobe Bryant : Buy Air Jordan, Oakley Sunglasses Online, Armani Underwear,
GCwaitforever
03-22 09:29 PM
Wow! This reminds me of Hydra. No offense meant, but these seemingly independent organizations work collectively on many fronts, connected by same STEM.
Everyone should read this article. A real eye opener.
Everyone should read this article. A real eye opener.
dresses kobe bryant mom. kobe bryant
santa123
06-17 10:02 PM
It all depends when someone applies for the labor, if you had BS+ 5 yrs exp and then did MS +4 yrs if you apply your labor now you can claim MS+9 again the experience at the current employer is not counted.....
Thanks!
But I am with my current employer for the past 5 yrs (In India & US together)!!!
Is that exp not counted at all?:confused:
My GC is for future employment with another employer though...
Thanks!
But I am with my current employer for the past 5 yrs (In India & US together)!!!
Is that exp not counted at all?:confused:
My GC is for future employment with another employer though...
more...
makeup kobe bryant Crazy 8 shoes 41-
Desertfox
08-11 09:23 PM
I am getting my GC processed on a future employment offer. I already have my EB3 I-140 approved from NSC after A2P RFE, and my I-485 is pending since July 07. I plan to join my sponsoring employer shortly using my EAD, but my attorney told me that I have the optio to wait until I-485 approval. Hope this helps.
girlfriend kobe bryant 5 rings wallpaper.
beavis
08-10 08:02 PM
We have the same situation. I am the primary and got my GC last July. Spouse still does not have it. We have a PD of Sep 2005 and 485 RD of Sep 2005. No idea what is happening. We also have contacted our Congressman, Senator, and done Infopass and SR. Our case was originally filed at VSC, transferred to TSC and is now at a "USCIS Office"
hairstyles kobe bryant background. kobe
minimalist
01-11 05:26 AM
I probabably know the answer of this question but would still like to confirm, just to be sure:
- First I-797B Valid from Jan 2004 to Sep 2006 <- Note: wasn't for 3 years
- First Visa valid from Jul 2004 to Sep 2006
- 1st US Entry Date from Aug 2005 till present date
(been to india in Dec 2007 for 1 month for visa stamping)
- First i-94 valid from Aug 2005 to Sep 2006
-Extended I-797A from Sep 2006 to Jan 2009 <-Note: not extended for 3 yrs
-2nd Visa/I-94 valid from Dec 2007 to Jan 2009
My questions?
1. Can my H1B Visa be extended again? This will be my 2nd extension.
2. Till what Date can be extended?
a. Jan 2010 (6 yrs from 1st I-797)
b. Jul 2010 ( 6 yrs from 1st visa stamping)
c. Aug 2011 (6 yrs from 1st US entry)
Thanks a lot !
Meaning 6 yrs from 1st US entry subtracting the time you are out of USA for vacaion.
Meaning Sep 2011, if you were out of USA only for a month.
- First I-797B Valid from Jan 2004 to Sep 2006 <- Note: wasn't for 3 years
- First Visa valid from Jul 2004 to Sep 2006
- 1st US Entry Date from Aug 2005 till present date
(been to india in Dec 2007 for 1 month for visa stamping)
- First i-94 valid from Aug 2005 to Sep 2006
-Extended I-797A from Sep 2006 to Jan 2009 <-Note: not extended for 3 yrs
-2nd Visa/I-94 valid from Dec 2007 to Jan 2009
My questions?
1. Can my H1B Visa be extended again? This will be my 2nd extension.
2. Till what Date can be extended?
a. Jan 2010 (6 yrs from 1st I-797)
b. Jul 2010 ( 6 yrs from 1st visa stamping)
c. Aug 2011 (6 yrs from 1st US entry)
Thanks a lot !
Meaning 6 yrs from 1st US entry subtracting the time you are out of USA for vacaion.
Meaning Sep 2011, if you were out of USA only for a month.
_shoonya
07-13 12:58 AM
Yes, as per current law you can get SS benefits after retirement age even if you do not have a GC and even if you are not residing in US. The only requirement is for you to have 40 SS credits.
However, given the current state of SS, it is quite likely that rules might change over next 5, 10, 20, 30 years.
However, given the current state of SS, it is quite likely that rules might change over next 5, 10, 20, 30 years.
ajcates
10-31 12:35 PM
There is a show on nickelodeon that instead of macs has pears.