ram_ram
09-29 08:00 PM
May2 2006.eb2 still waiting
wallpaper imagenes de amor con frases.
shreekarthik
06-22 10:04 PM
While having Vayalar Ravi talk to US Govt. on social security taxes is a good idea having him talk about retrogression is a very bad idea.
Permanent residency and retrogression are internal affairs of US of A. USA and USA alone will determine who gets their PR and citizenship. Any foreign official touching that subject will be seen as infringing on this nation's sovereignity.
During the 60s USA wanted lot of doctors and imported them from India. Later on they started producing their own doctors and we know how difficult it is for an Indian doctor to emigrate now. I suspect computer programmers are the next. The current focus is on importing nurses and when they have enough nurses they will have the same problem..... Isn't life very fair ?
Permanent residency and retrogression are internal affairs of US of A. USA and USA alone will determine who gets their PR and citizenship. Any foreign official touching that subject will be seen as infringing on this nation's sovereignity.
During the 60s USA wanted lot of doctors and imported them from India. Later on they started producing their own doctors and we know how difficult it is for an Indian doctor to emigrate now. I suspect computer programmers are the next. The current focus is on importing nurses and when they have enough nurses they will have the same problem..... Isn't life very fair ?
.jpg "Imagenes de Amor; Imagenes de")
gc??
09-02 09:00 AM
At the mercy of USCIS :eek:
2011 imagenes de amor
Circus123
02-10 02:47 PM
It is time again for setting expectations before the bulletin is released and then see it shattered like a glass falling on the floor :) Anyway here are my expectations:
MARCH 2008 VISA BULLETIN
-----------------------------
EB3-ROW March 2003
EB3-INDIA June 2001 (sorry had high hopes last time)
EB2-ROW C
EB2-INDIA June 2001 (change from U - Unavailable)
Please feel free to predict your expectations.
MARCH 2008 VISA BULLETIN
-----------------------------
EB3-ROW March 2003
EB3-INDIA June 2001 (sorry had high hopes last time)
EB2-ROW C
EB2-INDIA June 2001 (change from U - Unavailable)
Please feel free to predict your expectations.
more...
Green4Ev1
06-04 11:36 AM
Salawrene,
Congratulations.
Don't mind a few people's complaints.
Most people including myself don't know the details of the immigration law.
That's why we need lawyers, and you followed your lawyer's suggestion to get your GC.
Congratulations, again
Congratulations.
Don't mind a few people's complaints.
Most people including myself don't know the details of the immigration law.
That's why we need lawyers, and you followed your lawyer's suggestion to get your GC.
Congratulations, again
JunRN
10-19 09:18 AM
As per USCIS official report as of end-August, there were more than 500,000 pending AOS applications:
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/APPLICATIONS%20FOR%20IMMIGRATION%20BENEFITS_Aug07. pdf
So, if we estimate that there were about 100,000 more AOS applications receipted during September and October, that is a total of 600,000.
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/APPLICATIONS%20FOR%20IMMIGRATION%20BENEFITS_Aug07. pdf
So, if we estimate that there were about 100,000 more AOS applications receipted during September and October, that is a total of 600,000.
more...
gc_chahiye
08-14 02:06 PM
I am in a similar position and am going to wait till the end of the year for the AP. I am hoping to be able to go for the H1B stamping with the AP. So if there is any problem with the H1 I can atleast re-enter using the AP. Its a nice backup...
2010 Imagenes de Amor; Imagenes de
Kitiara
12-30 10:21 AM
Sorry about anyone not being able to view Lost's entry - I've updated the link now so you should all be able to have a look at it. :)
more...
number30
04-09 05:33 PM
I got RFE through attorney. It is asking following details
1. Emloyment verification letter with present and intended permanent employer
2. Last two months pay slips
3. "Although your I 140 petitioner indicated in your initial I485 filing that you were employed by company A at that time, your Form G325 indicated that you were employed by company B and you were authorized by B at that time, please explain discrepancy"
I am bit worried about question 3. I worked for company A and labor, I140 applied when I was with A.
But during I485 filing I was with company B and in G325 I mentioned that.
It looks like company A by mistake mentioned that I was still with them.
I called my attorney he said its upto me decide which company I should work for.
But I am not sure company A provides an employment letter for me because I am working for comapny B now.
If B provides employment letter since it is >180 days since I 485 applied, will there be any issues?
Please give your opinions...
Did you put employment letter or offer letter from employer A while filing the I485?
1. Emloyment verification letter with present and intended permanent employer
2. Last two months pay slips
3. "Although your I 140 petitioner indicated in your initial I485 filing that you were employed by company A at that time, your Form G325 indicated that you were employed by company B and you were authorized by B at that time, please explain discrepancy"
I am bit worried about question 3. I worked for company A and labor, I140 applied when I was with A.
But during I485 filing I was with company B and in G325 I mentioned that.
It looks like company A by mistake mentioned that I was still with them.
I called my attorney he said its upto me decide which company I should work for.
But I am not sure company A provides an employment letter for me because I am working for comapny B now.
If B provides employment letter since it is >180 days since I 485 applied, will there be any issues?
Please give your opinions...
Did you put employment letter or offer letter from employer A while filing the I485?
hair fondos de pantalla de amor.
swarnapuri
04-04 09:57 AM
To all IV members, We are doing a good job.
As with any work there are some errands to take care. Let us not divert from working on our core collective goals.
Keep it up.
Once again thanks for all your efforts!
As with any work there are some errands to take care. Let us not divert from working on our core collective goals.
Keep it up.
Once again thanks for all your efforts!
more...
GCard_Dream
11-30 09:02 PM
I am sure lot of us who are stuck in this GC mess like you can relate to your frustration and must be looking for a backup plan. There are certainly other attractive options like you mentioned if one does decide to jump ship and frankly I have done the same. Should this GC issue not get resolved in a reasonable amount of time, I am fully prepared and ready to jump off of GC wagon. I suggest we all do that.
Guys,
The reality is that we are just being played upon by the companies and the US govt regarding green cards. Employers know that we are not going to budge from our jobs to maintain the coveted priority date and the government is in no big hurry to reform the system as they can collect taxes from us without being accountable to us.
I think Democrats are also going to drag the immigration issue as seen by the article below :
http://www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/151357,CST-EDT-Perez28.article
I do not mean to doubt IV, but the writing is on the wall that our lobbying efforts are not going to go too far.
For all of you single people out there, the only fastest option is to marry a US girl/guy. For all those who are married, the choices are simple, forget the American dream and adopt a Canadian or Australian dream or endure the uncertainty of a green card application.
I have reached the conclusion that I cannot bear this uncertainty any more and therefore, I am pursuing other options. Ciao...Good luck to all those waiting for a GC!
Guys,
The reality is that we are just being played upon by the companies and the US govt regarding green cards. Employers know that we are not going to budge from our jobs to maintain the coveted priority date and the government is in no big hurry to reform the system as they can collect taxes from us without being accountable to us.
I think Democrats are also going to drag the immigration issue as seen by the article below :
http://www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/151357,CST-EDT-Perez28.article
I do not mean to doubt IV, but the writing is on the wall that our lobbying efforts are not going to go too far.
For all of you single people out there, the only fastest option is to marry a US girl/guy. For all those who are married, the choices are simple, forget the American dream and adopt a Canadian or Australian dream or endure the uncertainty of a green card application.
I have reached the conclusion that I cannot bear this uncertainty any more and therefore, I am pursuing other options. Ciao...Good luck to all those waiting for a GC!
hot imagenes de amor
glen
04-08 10:16 PM
This is like another feather in the hat....
Great job by IV members...
Great job by IV members...
more...
house amor imagenes. amor fotos.
qplearn
10-09 10:45 AM
We are talking two different things here. You are saying about AC-21. The OP is asking about retaining PD. The way you can retain your PD after I-140 approval is :-
You file a new labor with the new employer - once it is approved - you need to file a new I-140 application and attach the old approved application with it - this would ensure that your PD will become the PD from the old case.
Difference with AC21 is - in the case of AC21, you just switch jobs and your current GC process continues - you do not have to file a new labor,140 etc.
Dilbert_cal:
Does this mean that with AC-21, I can just switch jobs (provided it is similar), and that my PD etc remains the same and that I don't have to do my labor and I-140 again? My I-485 has been filed for more than a year now (my 140 is also approved), and while I would like to change my job, I don't want to do the whole thing again.
Your response will be HIGHLY appreciated, bcuz you seem to know this stuff well.
qplearn
You file a new labor with the new employer - once it is approved - you need to file a new I-140 application and attach the old approved application with it - this would ensure that your PD will become the PD from the old case.
Difference with AC21 is - in the case of AC21, you just switch jobs and your current GC process continues - you do not have to file a new labor,140 etc.
Dilbert_cal:
Does this mean that with AC-21, I can just switch jobs (provided it is similar), and that my PD etc remains the same and that I don't have to do my labor and I-140 again? My I-485 has been filed for more than a year now (my 140 is also approved), and while I would like to change my job, I don't want to do the whole thing again.
Your response will be HIGHLY appreciated, bcuz you seem to know this stuff well.
qplearn
tattoo makeup amor backgrounds.
gjoe
08-14 12:04 PM
Because it doesn't have a good reason. Please don't waste your money.
more...
pictures amor y amistad. fondos de amor
ebizash
07-07 02:37 PM
Thanks Desi3933 for such a quick response!
My employment offer letter has everything but the job duties but the job duties I can get from HR at anytime. In fact we have automated system that can generate all these in a PDF that the HR person can sign.
I am thinking that combination of offer letter, Job verification letter signed by HR, last pay stubs from previous employer, AC-21 memo and a cover letter explaining the portability provision should be enough.
The problem is my attorney is insisting that the letter that they sent for my employer's signature is "required" to successfully respond to this RFE. Is it really true? I have seen other posts where IV memebrs sent a very simple EVL and stuff.
Thanks
ebizash
My employment offer letter has everything but the job duties but the job duties I can get from HR at anytime. In fact we have automated system that can generate all these in a PDF that the HR person can sign.
I am thinking that combination of offer letter, Job verification letter signed by HR, last pay stubs from previous employer, AC-21 memo and a cover letter explaining the portability provision should be enough.
The problem is my attorney is insisting that the letter that they sent for my employer's signature is "required" to successfully respond to this RFE. Is it really true? I have seen other posts where IV memebrs sent a very simple EVL and stuff.
Thanks
ebizash
dresses imagenes d amor.
iluvcric
12-21 09:51 AM
Initially my case status was like whatever you said..but I got the FP and done. Now the case status says bit more like
On September 18, 2007, a fingerprint fee biling notice for this case I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS was mailed to you stating the reasons for the billing and the instructions to follow to submit the necessary payment. Therefore, processing of your case is suspended until we receive the necessary payment along with the billing notice we mailed to you. If you have not received this notice within 30 days of the September 18, 2007, please call Customer Service at 1-800-375-5283 for further assistance.
Does anyone know in the same boat?
My wife also in the same boat. Her FP is done and now the status is showing sameway like you.I have informed the same to my lawyer and awaiting response from them.
On September 18, 2007, a fingerprint fee biling notice for this case I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS was mailed to you stating the reasons for the billing and the instructions to follow to submit the necessary payment. Therefore, processing of your case is suspended until we receive the necessary payment along with the billing notice we mailed to you. If you have not received this notice within 30 days of the September 18, 2007, please call Customer Service at 1-800-375-5283 for further assistance.
Does anyone know in the same boat?
My wife also in the same boat. Her FP is done and now the status is showing sameway like you.I have informed the same to my lawyer and awaiting response from them.
more...
makeup imagenes de amor animadas
Tito_ortiz
01-31 03:58 PM
Based on what you believe that "BC has a much higher standard of living than Boston?". I hope that is not one of those silly annual surveys in which they interview low income and beggars on the streets and rate mainly based on health care and welfare for them.
Regarding raising kids, if you believe that doing that around prostitutes, lesbians and drugs is a good thing, so go ahead and live in BC.
Read the below for some truth about the Socialist Canada. I lived there and I know how it is.
www.notcanada.com
I would say Canada because British Columbia has a much higher standard of living than Boston. Canada is generally a much better place for raising kids and the stress levels are lower because of freebies like health care etc. BC also has a much better weather compared to Boston.
The other reason is that you could always come to the USA from Canada later but if you lose the Canadian PR now and don't manage to get a green card in the US, you lose everything.
Regarding raising kids, if you believe that doing that around prostitutes, lesbians and drugs is a good thing, so go ahead and live in BC.
Read the below for some truth about the Socialist Canada. I lived there and I know how it is.
www.notcanada.com
I would say Canada because British Columbia has a much higher standard of living than Boston. Canada is generally a much better place for raising kids and the stress levels are lower because of freebies like health care etc. BC also has a much better weather compared to Boston.
The other reason is that you could always come to the USA from Canada later but if you lose the Canadian PR now and don't manage to get a green card in the US, you lose everything.
girlfriend Imágenes de amor y amistad
krishmunn
03-09 03:18 PM
These are just guidelines from a law firm. Most of the law firms were making money in porting cases for last two years, as number of new applicants were less due to economy. That does not mean that USCIS is going to approve these cases based on number of years of education. Porting within a company is a risky deal. Even though lawers dont make it sound like a big deal, for getting new clients. The old eb3 job that was used to file the first labor needs to be filled. If you are working with a desi bodyshop, be careful. You are inviting an audit.
This does not appear to be just guidelines from a Law Firm. Read the first line --- it says "According to the AILA-NSC Liaison minutes of 04/12/2007"
The questions regarding same/different company is not relevant to this thread.
This does not appear to be just guidelines from a Law Firm. Read the first line --- it says "According to the AILA-NSC Liaison minutes of 04/12/2007"
The questions regarding same/different company is not relevant to this thread.
hairstyles RE: FONDOS AMOR Y LUJO
willgetgc2005
02-08 08:21 PM
rimzhim,
Dont you get it. berkleybee was a great asset to IV as a core team. Atleast I felt so. Her/his analysis and post on IV were great. All of a sudden BB disappeared from IV.
So I figured BB and IV did not fell out. I for one have great regard for BB and will any day trust his/her analysis.
IMHO IV would have been much stronger with Raz4u , BB etc.
They just vanished.
I am surprised to learn that she is a member of IV. why would she post on another forum?
Also, UNations: thanks for your realism. No offence to this lady or to UNations.
it is just that berkeleybee's post is scary.
Dont you get it. berkleybee was a great asset to IV as a core team. Atleast I felt so. Her/his analysis and post on IV were great. All of a sudden BB disappeared from IV.
So I figured BB and IV did not fell out. I for one have great regard for BB and will any day trust his/her analysis.
IMHO IV would have been much stronger with Raz4u , BB etc.
They just vanished.
I am surprised to learn that she is a member of IV. why would she post on another forum?
Also, UNations: thanks for your realism. No offence to this lady or to UNations.
it is just that berkeleybee's post is scary.
breddy2000
02-02 09:24 AM
We applied for H1B transfer on Jan/02/09 (California Service Center - Premimum) and attached pay stub and employement offer letter. First time we did not attach any contract details.
We got an RFE on Jan/09/09, Basically they wanted to know whether i am working on project currently. They are asking to submit contract agreements, client details (client letter - not sure it is must or not).
There are 2 layers between client and my employer and could not get client letter. However, I can provide the following docs,
1. Contract Agreement Between Employer and First Layer
2. Contract Agreement Between First and Primary Vendor
3. Letter from Primary Vendor (stating that i am working their client project).
4. Primary Vendor Invoices to Client
5. Time Sheet (Client approval)
6. Access Card
7. Work site Photo
8. Copy of Client WO (end date is 11/21/2008) - client with PO amount and end date is doest not matter... (i am not sure how is uscis will take it).
I could not able to client letter due to their policy. What do you guys think on this case approval. Any reply is highly appriciated..
thanks
I think first 4 should be enough to respond to the RFE.
1. Contract Agreement Between Employer and First Layer
2. Contract Agreement Between First and Primary Vendor
3. Letter from Primary Vendor (stating that i am working their client project).
4. Primary Vendor Invoices to Client
You just need to prove that you worked for that particular client during your H1 period.
Even though asked for it, I did not provide any contract details between Primary Vendor and Client and it was mentioned by my attorney that they do not have such policies.
Not sure whether you have an attorney or not, but make sure you go through them
Hope this helps
We got an RFE on Jan/09/09, Basically they wanted to know whether i am working on project currently. They are asking to submit contract agreements, client details (client letter - not sure it is must or not).
There are 2 layers between client and my employer and could not get client letter. However, I can provide the following docs,
1. Contract Agreement Between Employer and First Layer
2. Contract Agreement Between First and Primary Vendor
3. Letter from Primary Vendor (stating that i am working their client project).
4. Primary Vendor Invoices to Client
5. Time Sheet (Client approval)
6. Access Card
7. Work site Photo
8. Copy of Client WO (end date is 11/21/2008) - client with PO amount and end date is doest not matter... (i am not sure how is uscis will take it).
I could not able to client letter due to their policy. What do you guys think on this case approval. Any reply is highly appriciated..
thanks
I think first 4 should be enough to respond to the RFE.
1. Contract Agreement Between Employer and First Layer
2. Contract Agreement Between First and Primary Vendor
3. Letter from Primary Vendor (stating that i am working their client project).
4. Primary Vendor Invoices to Client
You just need to prove that you worked for that particular client during your H1 period.
Even though asked for it, I did not provide any contract details between Primary Vendor and Client and it was mentioned by my attorney that they do not have such policies.
Not sure whether you have an attorney or not, but make sure you go through them
Hope this helps
ameryki
03-09 03:32 PM
I am going to India for couple months and plans to return back on AP.I am planning to get my passport Renewal in India.Is it OK to Renew in India as it shows my India address.
Thanks In advance
don't make this mistake. renew it here in US even it means you postponing your travel dates....it is smooth, simple and effortless here as opposed to in india.
Thanks In advance
don't make this mistake. renew it here in US even it means you postponing your travel dates....it is smooth, simple and effortless here as opposed to in india.